Do retirees need a different approach to super?

Given that over 2.8 million super accounts will be moving from accumulation to the pension phase over the next decade, is it time to consider the implications of how member assets are pooled?

A new paper from Parametric managing director, research Raewyn Williams argues that the decisions these retirees make - keep their savings in their super fund, change funds, go self-managed or exit the system entirely - will "hugely influence the destiny of superannuation funds, so it’s critical they use their best thinking, and devote adequate resources, to ensure they get this decision right.”

One potential solution, the paper says, is to segregate member assets into separate accumulation and pension pools.

While noting "there's no hard and fast rule on what the best approach is," there are quantifiable benefits for segregation. As one example, the paper cites the "performance drag on international equity pension portfolios from foreign dividend withholding tax."

Williams adds: "This drag—38 basis points on a passive international equity portfolio over 2018—is a permanent cost to pension (but not accumulation) members and can be addressed if super funds can design exposures specifically for pension pools."

She continues: "For another example, consider the idea of ‘franking-credit-tilted’ Australian equities. Our previous research has identified the additional risks introduced into an accumulation portfolio to target this extra source of yield. But does this evaluation change if a segregated pension portfolio can double the extra yield for the same amount of risk—or redefine its definition of risk entirely?

“And how asset segregation would be implemented is also relevant to any decision and shouldn’t be parked for a later investigation.”

Less quantifiable factors included the ability to choose strategies "that better match pension member risk preferences" and setting higher liquidity rules for pension members while harvesting an illiquidity premium for accumulation members.

With an increased focus on how the Australian super system will manage a significant transition of members into retirement, these considerations are more important than ever.


The opinions expressed in this content are those of the author shown, and do not necessarily represent those of No More Practice Education Pty Ltd or its related entities. All content is intended for a professional financial adviser audience only and does not constitute financial advice. To view our full terms and conditions, click here.

Related opinions

Know your financial rights

Alex Burke

Australia's financial complaints body has been given new powers. ...

View Opinion >

How has the Royal Commission affected advice affordability?

Paul Tynan

Are changes to laws making advice cheaper, or more expensive for those who need it most? ...

View Opinion >

The best super advice you're not taking

Rod Dickinson

It’s all too easy to make retirement planning mistakes and end up at a destination that wasn’t at all what you’d hoped for....

View Opinion >

The RBA just cut the cash rate to a record low

Alex Burke

What does this mean for the Australian economy?...

View Opinion >

Opinions

Get the latest opinons

Enter your email address to subscribe to our Investment Series newsletter and we’ll let you know when new content goes live.

Please enter a valid email address.

Almost there!

Thank you for registering your interest in Opinions. . We’ll email you the latest content as it goes live. To complete the subscription process, click on the subscribe button below. An email will then be sent to you outlining steps to finalise your subscription.

We’re committed to helping you get the investment knowledge you want, so let us know what you’d love to see more of:

  • TV Show
  • Wealth Stories
  • Experts
  • All of the above

I have read and agree to the terms, privacy policy and financial services guide.